Something for a Cold Night in February
Reduced, as we are, to the enforced aphorisms of Twitter, or a few laconic lines in Facebook, the scolded diktat to be pithy in blog posts seems like a piece of Victorian social morality, (pace Strunk & White and Professor Althouse) made quaint by technology and new circumstances. So, I don’t think it impolite to ask you to read something that might tax a Twitterer’s dried-up brain.
Not having the Latin of Martial to write epigrams, it might do this blog, and our brains, a little good to see some lengthy, honest English prose, albeit from a time when the educated knew Martial, and their English wasn’t as honest as it might have been. They also generally understood the allusions Laurence Sterne put into Tristram Shandy, his comic masterpiece that came out in nine volumes between 1761 and 1767. It was full of everything from Rabelais and Cervantes to the Bible and obscure bits of Classical learning, not to mention Sterne’s bawdy humor and ridicule of solemnity. Schopenhauer counted Tristram Shandy as one of the four most important novels written, along with Goethe’s Wilhelm Meister, Rousseau’s Nouvelle Héloïse, and Cervantes’ Don Quixote.
So, here is the first chapter of Book VII of Tristram Shandy, published in 1765, and which I hope can loosen our virtual tongues to say something about in 2012. Sterne, so full of good spirits, and ready to fly halfway around the world to avoid him, did have the honor of Death knocking at his door three years after these lines were written, having been summoned by the “vile cough” he writes of, or as we know it in our modern, clinical way, tuberculosis:
* * * * * * * *
No——I think, I said, I would write two volumes every year, provided the vile cough which then tormented me, and which to this hour I dread worse than the devil, would but give me leave——and in another place—(but where, I can’t recollect now) speaking of my book as a machine, and laying my pen and ruler down cross-wise upon the table, in order to gain the greater credit to it—I swore it should be kept a going at that rate these forty years if it pleased but the fountain of life to bless me so long with health and good spirits.
Now as for my spirits, little have I to lay to their charge—nay so very little (unless the mounting me upon a long stick, and playing the fool with me nineteen hours out of the twenty-four, be accusations) that on the contrary, I have much—much to thank ’em for: cheerily have ye made me tread the path of life with all the burdens of it (except its cares) upon my back; in no one moment of my existence, that I remember, have ye once deserted me, or tinged the objects which came in my way, either with sable, or with a sickly green; in dangers ye gilded my horizon with hope, and when DEATH himself knocked at my door—ye bade him come again; and in so gay a tone of careless indifference did ye do it, that he doubted of his commission——
“There must certainly be some mistake in this matter,” quoth he.
Now there is nothing in this world I abominate worse, than to be interrupted in a story——and I was that moment telling Eugenius a most tawdry one in my way, of a nun who fancied herself a shell-fish, and of a monk damned for eating a mussel, and was shewing him the grounds and justice of the procedure——
“—Did ever so grave a personage get into so vile a scrape?” quoth Death. Thou hast had a narrow escape, Tristram, said Eugenius, taking hold of my hand as I finished my story——
But there is no living, Eugenius, replied I, at this rate; for as this son of a whore has found out my lodgings——
—You call him rightly, said Eugenius,—for by sin, we are told, he entered the world——I care not which way he entered, quoth I, provided he be not in such a hurry to take me out with him—for I have forty volumes to write, and forty thousand things to say and do, which no body in the world will say and do for me, except thyself; and as thou seest he has got me by the throat (for Eugenius could scarce hear me speak across the table) and that I am no match for him in the open field, had I not better, whilst these few scattered spirits remain, and these two spider legs of mine (holding one of them up to him) are able to support me—had I not better, Eugenius, fly for my life? ’Tis my advice, my dear Tristram, said Eugenius——Then by heaven! I will lead him a dance he little thinks of—for I will gallop, quoth I, without looking once behind me, to the banks of the Garonne; and if I hear him clattering at my heels——I’ll scamper away to Mount Vesuvius——from thence to Joppa, and from Joppa to the world’s end, where, if he follows me, I pray God he may break his neck——
—He runs more risk there, said Eugenius, than thou.
Eugenius’s wit and affection brought blood into the cheek from whence it had been some months banished—’twas a vile moment to bid adieu in; he led me to my chaise——Allons! said I; the postboy gave a crack with his whip——off I went like a cannon, and in half a dozen bounds got into Dover.
louisemowder said,
February 11, 2012 at 7:56 pm
“Now there is nothing in this world I abominate worse, than to be interrupted in a story…” is Tristram’s most oxymoronic statement in a long book composed of nothing but interruptions.You are correct that it is a fabulous read for a cold February.
Here in New Jersey, it hasn’t been a cold February – more like a cold April. But ’tis enough; ’twill serve.
lh said,
February 12, 2012 at 2:02 am
Being a big fan of Tristram Shandy and also of you, among other things, I would in fact “share” this post of yours…but for just two–OK, three, counting “and”–words. I can understand the ongoing irritation, but not the desire to constantly draw in others when they’d rather just let it go *for themselves* (it’s not like they’re asking YOU to, personally) and move on.
You, too, have choices.
And this is a great post. I absolutely love it. Just so you know.
XXOO
lh said,
February 12, 2012 at 2:02 am
[Forgot to click notify box. Doing it herein.]
Tim said,
February 12, 2012 at 4:00 am
I think that many, if not most, people here first became acquainted with each other through Althouse’s eponymous blog. It’s also true that some now have less to do with Althouse than others. But I am not going to deny history, or omit to mention her when warranted.
Uncle Toby rode his hobby-horse—in the good company of Corporal Trim, to be sure—until it came to pieces with the Peace of Utrecht. Her many readers know that first among Professor Althouse’s several hobby-horses is a lean thoroughbred named Concision. How many times has she exhorted her followers to brevity? How often has she taken other writers to task for bloviation? She has expended an equal energy, over a similar number of years, erecting her own model fortifications as Uncle Toby did his, except hers have been for a siege, not of any particular Flemish town, but laid against verbosity in general. And she has Uncle Toby one better: There will never be news so dire as to cause her to breach her earthworks against the Overlong.
So, I hope you will forgive my quoting the best example I know of a scold against prolixity. It connotes neither approval nor disapproval, and has nothing to do with any quarrel or controversy, past or present.
lh said,
February 12, 2012 at 4:14 am
Understood.
/off-topic subject input [carry on]
lh said,
February 12, 2012 at 4:45 am
This one’s for you. (You forget.)
mockturtle said,
February 12, 2012 at 11:46 am
Brilliant writing! Thanks for reminding me that I’ve yet to read that novel!
kngfish said,
February 12, 2012 at 6:19 pm
I, too, was pointed at Tristram Shandy by Schopenhauer; having nicked it in high school Parerga and Paralipomena was my “fun reader” for years….I still get a kick out of it! Perhaps our bloggeress could comment on his infamous essay “On Women” over at “Cloven…”
But there’s no need to be slamming Althouse or Twitter….each gets us down the road a piece…. I’m in a town 20, 40, nay, 100 deep in book geeks, so pompous, so prolix, so bloviating about all things literary, they make me ashamed I ever picked up a book to begin with….but I can’t, and won’t hold that against books themselves! Life is what it is.
I’ve been meaning to write up some more of my Saints of The House of Fun posts again, with Martial at the top of the list! (and, oh yeah, La Rouchefoucauld as well!) Perhaps those are coming soon….
Thnx for the post! We can RT it for you….
Icepick said,
February 12, 2012 at 9:14 pm
How often has she taken other writers to task for bloviation?
Hey now, Greenwald deserves it.
Icepick said,
February 12, 2012 at 9:27 pm
Prolixity ruins celerity and thwarts alacrity, though the prolix enter each conversation with an alacritous celerity of tongue.
Icepick said,
February 12, 2012 at 9:31 pm
Sorry, that should have been better, but I’m in a hurry.
karen said,
February 13, 2012 at 8:23 pm
(… where are my floaties– has anyone see my floaties?)(damn…)
You all sound like you’re speaking a foreign tongue, you know that, right?
Sigh.
My February evening is warming up nicely, now :0).
——————————————-
Ice– after looking up prolixity, celerity AND alacrity in my handy-dandy Webster’s– it has been marked in red that i am all three of those hoity-toity sounding words, albeit– not in that order.
The best part of this man’s madness is his use of dashes- like notation in music for breathing- it’s natural. I actually get that.
“—Did ever so grave a personage get into so vile a scrape?” quoth Death.”
Grave/Death. Get that, too.
Didn’t quite get the AA references- i do know a little of the history, T- and considering i read a LOT of her comments, i don’t quite understand the brevity thang because so of them are not brev(yeah, brief)- not @ all. I personally think she’s a fox, like… lets get them all off my scent and run through this hollow log– they’ll never know my true thoughts unless i spell it out. Just my opinion and since i need to belong to blogger or some such and have never taken the time to learn how to sign up– i never comment. Lucky for me, really.
And, lucky for me that i found y’all here and that i’m not really thrown into the deep end w/out a lifeguard on duty to haul my h2osucking tail out. You let me wade in slowly and splash in the shallow end– i thank you for that:0).
O/T(or not):
“It is a loving act to show
sadness when our dear
ones are torn from us,
but it is a holy act to be
joyful through hope and
trust in God’s promises”
St. Paulinus of Nola
ps– is “Cloven” a blog?
mockturtle said,
February 13, 2012 at 11:55 pm
I’ve never been an analyst of literature. I only savor it, relish it. To me, it’s like eating or sex. I just enjoy the hell out of it.
kngfish said,
February 14, 2012 at 1:40 am
Ah, Karen, here you go!
http://clovennotcrested.wordpress.com/